Las Vegas Sands Drives Strategic Casino Expansion Efforts in Texas

• Las Vegas Sands remains heavily invested in Texas politics
• Sands aims to construct a casino resort in Dallas
• Sands is backing Texas Senate candidate John Huffman

---

Las Vegas Sands has poured millions into casino politics in Texas over recent years, driven by a long-term vision for a massive casino expansion in the region. Despite infrequent returns on these political contributions, the world’s largest casino operator remains steadfast in its commitment to the Lone Star State, viewing the territory as the ultimate frontier for its next major casino expansion.

According to campaign finance records from the Texas Ethics Commission, the Texas Sands PAC recently donated $500,000 to John Huffman, the Republican candidate for state Senate District 9. Huffman, previously a city councilor and mayor of Southlake in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, identifies himself as a “true fiscal conservative” dedicated to cutting taxes and reducing regulation.

Sands sees Huffman as a potential ally in promoting casino gambling in Texas, which they argue could boost the economy while redirecting tax revenue currently flowing to out-of-state competitors, such as tribal casinos in Oklahoma and commercial venues in Lake Charles, Louisiana. His main competitor in the upcoming special election on November 9, Republican Leigh Wambsganss, has stated her opposition to gambling, asserting it harms community dynamics.

“Research shows that gambling negatively impacts families and hurts communities as a whole,” Wambsganss told the Texas Scorecard. “Expanded gambling is not right for Texas.”

Huffman advocates for the notion that voters—rather than lawmakers—should ultimately decide on the viability of casinos in Texas. He mentioned, “If expansion occurs, it should be limited, well-regulated, and focused on a few, high-end resort destinations that create jobs and draw in tourism.”

The largest share of Sands is held by billionaire Dr. Miriam Adelson, who, along with her son-in-law Patrick Dumont, now controls the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks. In an impressive move, the Adelsons purchased a 69% stake in the Mavericks from Mark Cuban for roughly $3.8 billion late in 2023.

Casino Lobby

Sheldon Adelson, the founder and long-serving CEO of Sands, consistently pursued opportunities to enter the Texas market. Dr. Miriam Adelson is now continuing this legacy, driven by the ambition to expand gaming in Texas.

Her acquisition of the Mavericks is believed to enhance her influence in convincing Texas lawmakers to consider gambling legislation. Both Adelson and Cuban argue for a diverse mix of attractions to boost Texas’s tourism sector, suggesting an integrated resort casino paired with a new NBA arena.

Adelson and Sands are the principal financiers of Texas Sands PAC, contributing significantly to their goal. In August, she donated $9.1 million to this political action committee, while Sands added $4,500. Adelson also supports the Texas Defense PAC, which has given Huffman approximately $600,000, together accounting for nearly 94% of his total campaign fundraising.

Political Irony

It’s rather ironic that Wambsganss stands against casinos, given her family’s historical ties to the gaming sector. Her husband previously invested in a Virginia-based skill gaming manufacturer, operating in a state that has seen such games banned since July 2021.

Huffman shares a similar irony; last summer, he posted a list of favourite destinations across the United States, including a review of Las Vegas that reflected ambivalence towards the city. Although he appreciated the sights, he stated, “We were glad the kids saw it, but no one was in a rush to head back. It just wasn’t our style.” Similarly, he rated Las Vegas at sixteenth among twenty-one major cities they visited.

In summary, Las Vegas Sands continues to invest heavily in Texas politics, banking on the support of candidates like John Huffman to push for a gaming expansion that may reshape the state’s economic landscape. Their efforts illustrate the complex interplay between political contributions, personal convictions, and the future of gambling in Texas, prompting voters to consider the broader implications of such expansions.